Papers with ODQA datasets
Self-Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Open-Domain QA (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) aims to answer questions without explicitly providing specific background documents. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to explicitly utilize the massive knowledge encoded in LLM parameters and their strong instruction understanding abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses state-of-the-art methods on three widely-used ODQA datasets and achieves comparable performance with customized fine-tuned models on full training data. |
Aligning Retrieval with Reader Needs: Reader-Centered Passage Selection for Open-Domain Question Answering (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Chunlei Xin, Shuheng Zhou, Xuanang Chen, Yaojie Lu, Huijia Zhu, Weiqiang Wang, Zhongyi Liu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing retrieval methods aim to gather relevant passages but fail to prioritize consistent and useful information for the reader. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel method which re-ranks passages based on the reader's prediction probability distribution and clusters passage according to the predicted answers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the quality of evidence passages under zero-shot scenarios. |
Chain-of-Skills: A Configurable Model for Open-Domain Question Answering (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using customized retrieval models, model transferability and scalability are limited. |
| Approach: | They propose a modular retrieval model where individual modules correspond to key skills that can be reused across datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms self-supervised retrievers in zero-shot evaluations and achieves state-of-the-art fine-tuned retrieval performance on NQ, HotpotQA and OTT-QA. |
REANO: Optimising Retrieval-Augmented Reader Models through Knowledge Graph Generation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge graphs suffer from incompleteness and lack information critical for answering given questions. |
| Approach: | They propose to enhance the open domain question answering model with a knowledge graph generation module that generates KGs from the passages and an answer predictor. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the exact match score by 2.7% on the EntityQuestion dataset, with an average improvement of 1.8% across all the datasets. |
RFiD: Towards Rational Fusion-in-Decoder for Open-Domain Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Open-domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems rely on spurious features instead of genuine causal relationships to generate answers. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that leverages the encoders of FiD to distinguish between causal relationships and spurious features and guides the decoder to generate answers informed by this discernment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on two ODQA datasets and shows that it can identify causal relationships and identify spurious features. |
Learning to Retrieve Passages without Supervision (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Dense retrievers for open domain question answering have been shown to achieve impressive performance by training on large datasets of question-passage pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use recurring spans to create pseudo examples for contrastive learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all pretrained baselines on a wide range of ODQA datasets and is competitive with BM25, a strong sparse baseline. |
RobustQA: Benchmarking the Robustness of Domain Adaptation for Open-Domain Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Rujun Han, Peng Qi, Yuhao Zhang, Lan Liu, Juliette Burger, William Yang Wang, Zhiheng Huang, Bing Xiang, Dan Roth
| Challenge: | Existing ODQA datasets consist mainly of Wikipedia corpus, and are insufficient to study models’ generalizability across diverse domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate ODQA's domain robustness using Wikipedia corpus . they annotate QA pairs in retrieval datasets with rigorous quality control . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves model performance on annotated QA pairs in retrieval datasets with rigorous quality control. |
Dual Reader-Parser on Hybrid Textual and Tabular Evidence for Open Domain Question Answering (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing generative models for open-domain question answering focus on generating direct answers from unstructured textual information, but a large amount of knowledge is stored in structured databases, and need to be accessed using query languages such as SQL. |
| Approach: | They propose a hybrid framework that takes both textual and tabular evidences as input and generates either direct answers or SQL queries depending on which form could better answer the question. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models on OpenSQuAD datasets and can generate SQL queries on the associated databases to obtain the final answers. |
Open-domain Question Answering via Chain of Reasoning over Heterogeneous Knowledge (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing open-domain question answering methods rely on the retriever to gather all evidence in isolation, but our approach uses an intermediary module to perform a chain of reasoning over the retrieved set. |
| Approach: | They propose a new open-domain question answering framework that integrates an intermediary module into the current retriever-reader pipeline and integrates it into the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art on two OTT-QA datasets with an exact match score of 47.3 (45% relative gain). |
Not All Terms Matter: Recall-Oriented Adaptive Learning for PLM-aided Query Expansion in Open-Domain Question Answering (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Open-domain question answering (ODQA) systems typically adopt a retriever-reader architecture, where the retriever finds relevant documents, and the reader extracts or synthesizes answers. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that iteratively adjusts the importance weights of QE terms based on their relevance, refining term distinction and enhancing the separation of relevant terms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves retrieval accuracy and overall performance on four ODQA datasets and five QE methods. |